

Hoping the previous statements reflect a genuine honesty, some readers may see this work as an investment opportunity. But this is a conditional deal.
Concerning substance, I regularly violate principles of persuasion. Sometimes I mock the wilfull ignorance of my opposition. I even assign base motives and make no attempt to separate them from those motives (you know, "love the sinner, hate the sin" thing). I even use sarcasm. I tease my readers, challenge my readers, state conclusions in introductions, and alternately scold - or warn - my readers. Some may label me "a literary terrorist" - not an evangelical Christian !